Action Plan

Best Practice Corporate Governance for Net Promoter Score Success

Without explicit governance, a transactional NPS program drifts back to whoever has the loudest objection. Best practice uses two specific groups — a Steering Committee and a Process Team — operating in a three-layer model. Here's the membership of each, what they're responsible for, and how the model holds the program steady through executive churn.

By Adam Ramshaw 4 min read
Best Practice Corporate Governance for Net Promoter Score Success

When rolling out a transactional customer feedback process such as Net Promoter you need a corporate governance process that will deliver success. Best practice experience suggest two critical groups are needed: Steering Committee and Process Team.

In this post we discuss the role of each group and how you can build long term success.

NPS Corporate Governance

In our best practice NPS governance model there are three layers, each delivering part of the solution.

Steering Committee

This group has the overall responsibility for guiding and supporting the transactional customer feedback process within the organisation.

This group of, generally, senior executives meet on a regular basis to review progress, assign budgets, review and evaluate goals, etc. of the overall process.

In the rollout stages this group is especially important as a driving force to:

  • clear operational and staffing roadblocks,
  • allocate budget as required and
  • vocally support the move to a Net Promoter approach.

The role of the Steering Committee as a visible and vocal supporter of the change to transactional customer feedback collection and action is particularly important in the first 6 months of the move to Net Promoter.

It is in this stage that staff are naturally the most sceptical about the change and it is in this period when clear and present senior management support can bring people on board. Lack of that support may imply to staff that they can wait it out until the next management fad comes along.

During the rollout phase this team might meet on a two-weekly or monthly basis but longer term will normally meet on a two-monthly or quarterly basis. They are an approval and oversight group not an operational group.

Membership

Membership of this group should be senior executives within the division or company. Including the CEO, COO, Managing Director on the team is particularly valuable. In addition, senior leaders of key operational groups (call centres, distribution, etc.) are also excellent candidates for a place on this team.

One member on this team should be designated the Executive Sponsor of the process. It is this person who will liaise with Process Team on a regular basis and it is to this person that the team will nominally report.

Process Team

The other key group in the implementation of transactional customer feedback is the Process Team. The role of this group is to bring knowledge and understanding of the process to the rest of the organisation.

Typically in the early part of the rollout the Process Team will be more engaged in the development and setup of the data collection and analysis tools required to collect and use the customer feedback.

However, when the system is setup, their roll will evolve to one of education and supporting of the rest of the organisation in using the transactional feedback system. They will also be instrumental in supporting specific data analysis projects and work with the rest of the company to understand and use the information collected.

Membership

Some people suggest that this group should be a full-time standalone person, department or group within the company. In contrast our suggestion is that it be a cross functional group who take time from their day to day tasks to be part of the team.

This cross functional approach has a number of advantages:

  1. Additional budget does not need to be allocated to the hiring and support of a separate team.
  2. The team members are already embedded in the business: rather than have an external department team impose their need to “help” the operational units, the team members are already part of the operations. Help comes from the inside out. Because the business units already trust their own staff, they are more willing to accept suggestions.
  3. The team builds cross functional links: building cross functional links within the organisation is a healthy way to improve innovation and cross fertilisation within all companies.

The team members can be taken from operational areas such as call centres, services, support, etc. They can also be a mix of more senior and more junior staff.

Membership of the Process Team should be presented as aspirational for all staff. It should be remembered that members will present, on occasion, to the Steering Committee and so will provide them team with incremental visibility at senior management levels.

The skill set of the Process Team will evolve over time. Initially however, it will probably include more some members with more knowledge of the technical and data systems within the organisation. These skills are needed to support the implementation of the data collection and analysis system.

Longer term the team should consist of one or two staff with a more data analysis based skill set and the balance being operational staff. All members should be supporters of the approach and be keen to educate and help other staff.

Back to Blog

Related Posts

View All Posts »
How to Set Net Promoter Score® Targets For Your Staff and Company

How to Set Net Promoter Score® Targets For Your Staff and Company

Once NPS data is flowing, the question of targets follows within weeks. Set them badly and you'll get score-begging, gaming and demotivated staff. Here's a practical approach to setting NPS targets — including the prerequisites that need to be true first, why local targets beat global ones, and the case for waiting longer than feels comfortable before setting any.

Net Promoter Score® Survey Design and Examples

Net Promoter Score® Survey Design and Examples

Reichheld's "one number you need to grow" has misled a lot of teams into building one-question NPS surveys. They don't generate enough information to drive change. Drawing on hundreds of NPS survey designs across B2B and B2C, here are the elements of an NPS survey that earns its response rate — including which questions to add, which to leave out, and whether you can change the scale.

7 Reasons Your Net Promoter® Program is Failing: And How to Fix It

7 Reasons Your Net Promoter® Program is Failing: And How to Fix It

"We tried Net Promoter and it didn't work." Almost every time someone says that to me, it comes back to a small number of fixable implementation mistakes — no C-level buy-in, treated as market research, no root cause analysis, score collected and nothing done. Here are the seven, and how to correct each one without restarting the program.

You Need to Document “Why” When Implementing Net Promoter Score

You Need to Document “Why” When Implementing Net Promoter Score

Simon Sinek built a TED talk on the power of "why". Toyota built quality systems on it. Toddlers run their entire education on it. Yet most NPS rollouts skip it entirely. Here's why "why" is the first question to ask before investing in Net Promoter — and the kinds of answers that should stop the program before it starts.