Implementation

How the Australian Privacy Principles affect your Customer Feedback Program

The Australian Privacy Principles came into force on 12 March 2014, and they have specific implications for the way customer feedback programs are run — particularly the direct marketing rule (APP 7) and cross-border disclosure rule (APP 8). Here's a non-lawyer's walk-through of what changed and what to update in your feedback program. Caveats apply; this is not legal advice.

By Adam Ramshaw 5 min read
How the Australian Privacy Principles affect your Customer Feedback Program

Disclaimer: I will preface this post by stating that I am not a lawyer. The information below is my understanding from reading the documents and consulting with some specialists. It is provided in good faith and with no warranty of any kind.

In Australian, The National Privacy Principles and Information Privacy Principles came into effect on 12 March 2014.

In this post we’ll review how those principles affect your customer feedback process and what do you need to do about it.

Summary of the APP

At a high level the National Privacy Principles are as follows:

The Australian Privacy Principles (or APPs) are the cornerstone of the privacy protection framework in the Privacy Act 1988 (Privacy Act). They apply to any organisation or agency the Privacy Act covers.

There are 13 Australian Privacy Principles and they govern standards, rights and obligations around:
– the collection, use and disclosure of personal information
– an organisation or agency’s governance and accountability
– integrity and correction of personal information
– the rights of individuals to access their personal information

Reference: Australian Privacy Principles

The guidelines effectively apply to organisations with $3m or more in annual revenue.

The Key Customer Feedback Implications

Of course the guidelines cover many areas of information and privacy but I just want to pick out a couple that may have an impact on customer feedback processes.

Chapter 7 — APP 7 Direct Marketing

The first key point of the Australian Privacy Principle 7 — direct marketing is that

APP7.1: An organisation must not use or disclose the personal information that it holds about an individual for the purpose of direct marketing

It is my opinion, and that of many clients here and overseas, that transactional customer feedback is not marketing but part of the service delivery process.

A post interaction email or SMS survey is a part of the service itself not a marketing activity. So the question of needing marketing opt-in is not relevant.

At one point I did speak with an industry player and they suggested that customer feedback could be argued to be direct marketing.

The argument goes something like this: you are collecting customer feedback to improve your business, in order to sell more products, selling more products is marketing thus collecting feedback is marketing.

Personally I think that this is a stretch, especially if you do not include push polling in your survey – which you wouldn’t do anyway.

This interpretation would make any contact with a customer potentially a marketing contact.

However, you should discuss the implication of this section with your legal provider and make a determination for your business.

Chapter 8 — APP 8 Cross-Border Disclosure of Personal Information

Cross-border disclosure is important to customer feedback processes as often the tools that we use to collect customer feedback host customer data off-shore. For instance SurveyMonkey and salesforce.com both store their data in locations other than Australia.

APP8 specifically discusses what organisations need to do when data is transferred outside Australia.

In summary:

APP 8.1 …The framework generally requires an APP entity to ensure that an overseas recipient will handle an individual’s personal information in accordance with the APPs, and makes the APP entity accountable if the overseas recipient mishandles the information.

And further

before an APP entity discloses personal information about an individual to an overseas recipient, the entity must take reasonable steps to ensure that the recipient does not breach the APPs in relation to that information.

Reference: Australian Privacy Principle 8 – cross – border disclosure of personal information

This is not, it has to be said, a clear principle. The Privacy Act introduces the idea of ‘Disclosure’ but does not define it.

However, the principles go on to say:

8.8 An APP entity discloses personal information where it makes it accessible to others outside the entity and releases the subsequent handling of the information from its effective control.

From this it would appear that the provision of personal data to an overseas supplier, say loading a feedback invite list to the servers of an overseas survey system supplier, is an act of ‘Disclosure’.

So how do you address the issue of cross border data disclosure?

There are three main ways:

Don’t send you data overseas

Seems obvious, but if you retain a provider with an Australian based data centre the data stays in the country.

Use the “take reasonable steps” approach

APP 8.16 : If you enter into an enforceable contractual arrangement with the supplier that they will handle the data in accordance with the Australian Privacy Principles then you have taken reasonable steps.

Exactly how this is interpreted is however, subject to a “depend on the circumstances” clause (APP 8.17) so you need to read on with the details of what needs to be considered.

APP 8.1 is waived if the recipient has similar laws

This says if the laws in the recipient entity’s country are similar, or stronger, than the APPs then the entire APP 8.1 is waived.

You must have a “reasonable belief” this is the case.

APP8.20 “…must have a reasonable basis for its belief, and not merely a genuine or subjective belief. For example, this might be based on independent legal advice. It is the responsibility of an APP entity to be able to justify its reasonable belief.

Unfortunately there is no “white-list” of appropriate jurisdictions so you will need to contact your legal advisers on this one.

Summary

In summary, with the right contracts in place, these changes do not, to my reading, have any impact on the way that companies can collect customer feedback.

Back to Blog

Related Posts

View All Posts »
Customer Feedback Governance: Why It Matters and How to Do It Right

Customer Feedback Governance: Why It Matters and How to Do It Right

Nobody wants to talk about customer feedback governance — and that's exactly where most programs quietly fail. Sending surveys is necessary; driving change off the back of them needs a governance model. Here's the customer feedback cycle (Listen-React-Understand-Design-Act) and the steering-committee structure that holds the cycle together through executive churn.

Customer Feedback Management Meets Quality Systems

Customer Feedback Management Meets Quality Systems

Customer feedback programs eventually hit a wall that quality-systems people figured out decades ago in manufacturing — continuous improvement, reducing process variation, the discipline of acting on data. Most CX teams haven't learned the lessons. With transactional feedback giving you the volume and speed, here's how to plug quality systems into customer feedback and stop reinventing what Taylor and Deming already solved.

How customer surveys can affect customer purchase behaviors

How customer surveys can affect customer purchase behaviors

Customer surveys exhibit a marketing version of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle: the act of surveying changes the customer being surveyed. Dholakia and Morwitz's HBR research tracked surveyed customers over two years and found they were three times more likely to open new accounts, half as likely to defect, and more profitable. Here's the effect, the explanation, and what it means for survey design.

Customer Feedback Is Worthless Without This One Critical Element

Customer Feedback Is Worthless Without This One Critical Element

What separates Zappos, Amazon and Southwest from the unmemorable companies in the same industries isn't doctoral-level statistics, sophisticated survey questions or charismatic leadership. The actual difference is the boring one: they do something with the feedback. Here's what "do something" actually looks like, step by step, across innovation, immediate action, sales opportunity and service recovery.